Police may not summon to any one until any case registered against person. Sajjad Husain Advocate HC

If the Contempt Judge modifies or alters the main judgment while disposing of the contempt petition, the maintainability of a Special Appeal gains a nuanced dimension. The analysis of the provided PDF and relevant legal principles reveals the following: 1. General Principle: Under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 , an appeal is maintainable only against orders imposing punishment for contempt. Generally, this restricts appeals to situations where the contemnor is punished, and not where the contempt petition is dismissed or proceedings are dropped. 2. Exception in Case of Modification or Alteration: However, if the Contempt Judge: Modifies , alters , or varies the original order. Dilutes or issues fresh directions not originally contemplated by the main judgment. Adjudicates on the merits of the underlying dispute instead of merely ensuring compliance. Then, an argument can be made that the Contempt Judge has exceeded the jurisdiction under contempt proceedings. Th...

 Supreme Court of India, in the case of Vishal Shah vs. Monalisha Gupta & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No. of 2025, arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 4297 of 2023), made significant observations and rulings regarding the impounding of the appellant's passport . Here is a detailed summary of the Court's findings and orders specifically related to the passport issue: Key Facts Related to Passport: Passport Impounding : The appellant's passport was impounded on October 3, 2018 , by the Indian authorities under Section 10 of the Passport Act, 1967 . This action was taken based on the multiple criminal and civil cases filed by the respondent (Monalisha Gupta) against the appellant and his family members. Challenge to Impounding : The appellant challenged the impounding of his passport before the Calcutta High Court through a writ petition (WPA No. 4743 of 2020). However, the High Court dismissed the petition on January 15, 2021 , and upheld the impounding, barring the appellant from...

Petitioner has approaches by filing petition with request for fair and proper investigation, MP high court at Jabalpur has rejected the plea for fair and proper investigation. See judgement    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1va6gc63nuMpmuQAOVZCqWOG9FQtvdBLk/view?usp=drivesdk

  Sending an important message to the Courts across the country, the Supreme Court recently lamented that the High Courts and Trial Courts have forgotten that bail cannot be denied as a punishment."Over a period of time, the trial courts and the High Courts have forgotten a very well settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment," observed a bench comprising Justices [(Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra Judgement on Bail ) (Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra Judgement on Bail - Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra , p1) . https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rrKRCnT9Y8Qe1lipiXGq2x1Vew9u7fIl/view?usp=drivesdk

  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1k38ZX85i9zEI39YQzcCVX33qlxX1pwZZ/view?usp=drivesdk 1.  Allahabad High Court sitting at Lucknow has held that pass port authority has no power to kept pending the passport application of citizens  2. Time bound disposal is mandatory  3. Pendency of criminal case is no ground to pending and kept the matter in pending  4. Pass port is right of citizen  5. Holding passport is fundamental right of citizens