High Court and Trial Court have forgotten bail is a matter of right

 Sending an important message to the Courts across the country, the Supreme Court recently lamented that the High Courts and Trial Courts have forgotten that bail cannot be denied as a punishment."Over a period of time, the trial courts and the High Courts have forgotten a very well settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment," observed a bench comprising Justices


[(Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra Judgement on Bail )

(Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra Judgement on Bail - Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra , p1).


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rrKRCnT9Y8Qe1lipiXGq2x1Vew9u7fIl/view?usp=drivesdk

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pass port officer can retain and stop, kept pending, timely released ordered by Supreme Court of India SPL Cri 4297 of 2023

 Supreme Court of India, in the case of Vishal Shah vs. Monalisha Gupta & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No. of 2025, arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 4297 of 2023), made significant observations and rulings regarding the impounding of the appellant's passport . Here is a detailed summary of the Court's findings and orders specifically related to the passport issue: Key Facts Related to Passport: Passport Impounding : The appellant's passport was impounded on October 3, 2018 , by the Indian authorities under Section 10 of the Passport Act, 1967 . This action was taken based on the multiple criminal and civil cases filed by the respondent (Monalisha Gupta) against the appellant and his family members. Challenge to Impounding : The appellant challenged the impounding of his passport before the Calcutta High Court through a writ petition (WPA No. 4743 of 2020). However, the High Court dismissed the petition on January 15, 2021 , and upheld the impounding, barring the appellant from...
Read more

Victim Has Right To Participate In Trial But No Right To Be Impleaded In Criminal Revision: Delhi High Court Nupur Thapliyal 25 May 2024 4:20 PM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 19.03.2024 Pronounced on: 24.05.2024 + CRL.M.C. 8758/2023 & CRL.M.A. 7381/2024 VLS FINANCE LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Bharat Chugh, Mr.Jai Allagh, Mr.Maanish M. Choudhary, Mr.Ashok Kr. Sharma, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP for R-1/State. Mr.Vijay Agarwal, Mr.Gurpreet Singh, Mr.Jatin S.Sethi, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA J U D G M E N T    The judgment primarily addresses the issue of whether a victim or complainant in a criminal case has the right to be impleaded as a party in revision petitions and other criminal proceedings. The court's decision rests on the interpretation of several sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and relevant case law. Key Points of the Judgment: Right to be Heard vs. Right to be Impleaded: The court distinguished between the right to be heard and the right to be impleaded as a party in criminal...
Read more

No permission of Court is required for passport even if criminal is under investigation or pending for trail in Court Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench Writ C No. 5587 of 2024 (Umapati Vs. union of India & Ors) Justice Alok Mathur and Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal J

Image
  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1k38ZX85i9zEI39YQzcCVX33qlxX1pwZZ/view?usp=drivesdk 1.  Allahabad High Court sitting at Lucknow has held that pass port authority has no power to kept pending the passport application of citizens  2. Time bound disposal is mandatory  3. Pendency of criminal case is no ground to pending and kept the matter in pending  4. Pass port is right of citizen  5. Holding passport is fundamental right of citizens 
Read more