Police may not summon to any one until any case registered against person. Sajjad Husain Advocate HC

  “ प्रकाशनार्थ स्वीकृत” निनर्ण य सुरक्षित- 15.03.2022 निनर्ण य उद्घोनि"त- 01.04.2022 क संख्या . - 69 वाद :- स्र्थानान्तरर्ण प्रार्थ ना पत्र (आपराक्षि/क) संख्या - 285/ 2021 आवेदक :- शैलेन्द्र कुमार प्रजापक्षित निवपी :- उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य व अन्य आवेदक के अक्षि/वक्ता :- रामराज प्रजापक्षित निवपी के अक्षि/वक्ता :- शासकीय अक्षि/वक्ता माननीय सौरभ श्याम शमशेरी , ( न्यायमूर्तित ) तथ्यात्मक प्रारुप 1. आवेदक (शैलेन्द्र कुमार प्रजापक्षित ) ने वत मान स्र्थानान्तरर्ण प्रार्थ ना पत्र अंतर्ग त /ारा 407 दण्ड प्रनिKया संनिLता (संेप में द. प्र.सं.) के माध्यम से सत्र परीर्ण संख्या 90 व" 2021, राज्य प्रक्षित शैलेन्द्र (मुकदमा अपरा/ संख्या 48 व" 2019 /ारा 376, 452, 506 भारतीय दण्ड संनिLता, र्थाना निवनवार, जिजला Lमीरपुर से अग्रसर) जो वत मान में अपर जनपद एवं सत्र न्याय/ीश एफ.टी.सी. Lमीरपुर के न्यायालय में लंनिTत Lै को जिजला Lमीरपुर के उक्त सत्र न्यायालय से उसी जिजला के निकसी दसरे सत्र न्यायालय में अन्तरिरत ू करने की प्रार्थ ना की Lै। 2. वत मान आवेदन के प्रस्तुत करने से पूव , आवेदक न...

 AFR Court No. - 19 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 295 of 2022 Petitioner :- Smt. Kalawati Respondent :- The Board Of Revenue And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramendra Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishikesh Tripathi Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Sri Ramendra Asthana, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ajeet Kumar Singh, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri J.P.N. Raj, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Rishikesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 to 7. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking to raise a challenge to the order dated 05.10.2021 passed by the respondent no.1-Board of Revenue, U.P. at Lucknow dismissing the Revision No. REV/1789/2019/Banda (Computerized Case No. R20190711001789, Smt. Kalawati vs. Pramod Singh), the earlier order dated 16.08.2019 passed by the respondent no.2- Up-Ziladhikari, Banda in Appeal No. T2018017110104138 (Smt. Kalawati vs. Smt. Shiv...

 1 Reserved AFR Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28762 of 2021 Applicant :- Umesh Kumar Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jaysingh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,A Kumar Srivastava,Manish Kumar Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J. Heard Shri Jay Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Rabindra Kumar Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State and Shri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party No. 2 and perused the record of the case. By means of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (herein after referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) the applicants have prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of complaint case No. 1749 of 2017 (Kamla Shankar Yadav Vs. Umesh Kumar Yadav and others), under Section 406 IPC and Section 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, police station Handia, district Allahabad, pending in the court ...

Court No. - 9 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 80 of 2022 Petitioner :- Ram Vilas Thru. Daughter Sarojani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Letter Petition Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Learned A.G.A. has filed short counter affidavit, the same is taken on record. Heard Mr. Shyamendra Singh learned counsel for the petitioner whose power is taken on record, Mr. S.P. Singh learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material brought on record of this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition. Pursuant to our previous order passed on 8th April, 2022, treating the Letter Petition filed by daughter of petitioners to be a Habeas Corpus Petition, certain facts were brought to the notice of this Court on point that the petitioners namely, Savitri and Ram Vilas have been called at Police Station- Mahila Thana, Lucknow, from where they have not returned as ye...